Efficacy of a fast-track pathway for managing uncomplicated renal or ureteral colic in a hospital emergency department: the STONE randomized clinical trial of Sonography and Testing of a Nephrolithiasis Episode. / Eficacia de una vía de alta resolución en la evaluación del cólico renoureteral no complicado en un servicio de urgencias hospitalario: un ensayo clínico aleatorizado (Estudio STONE).

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate a fast-track pathway utilizing point-of-care (POC) testing and sonography as soon as uncomplicated renal or ureteral colic is suspected and to compare the POC clinical pathway to a standard one. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Unblinded randomized controlled clinical trial in a hospital emergency department (ED). We enrolled patients with suspected uncomplicated renal or ureteral colic and randomized them to a POC or standard pathway (1:1 ratio). Duration of ED stay, treatments, the proportion of diagnoses other than uncomplicated colic, and 30-day complications were analyzed. RESULTS: One hundred forty patients were recruited between November 2018 and October 2019; data for 124 were analyzed. The mean (SD) total time in the ED was 112 (45) minutes in the POC arm and 244 (102) in the standard arm (P .001). Treatments, alternative diagnoses, and complication rates did not differ. CONCLUSION: The use of a fast-track POC pathway to manage uncomplicated colic in the ED is effective and safe. It also reduces the amount of time spent in the ED.

OBJETIVO: Evaluar una vía de alta resolución (vía POC) que utiliza análisis en el punto de atención (point-of-care testing ­POCT­) y ecografía en el punto de atención (point-of-care ultrasonography ­POCUS­) en la sospecha del cólico renoureteral (CRU) no complicado y compararla con la vía estándar (vía STD). METODO: Ensayo clínico aleatorizado, controlado, no ciego, realizado en un servicio de urgencias hospitalario (SUH). Incluyó pacientes con sospecha clínica de CRU agudo y se aleatorizaron 1:1 a seguir vía POC o vía STD. Se analizó el tiempo de estancia en el SUH, el tratamiento administrado, la proporción de diagnósticos alternativos a CRU y las complicaciones a 30 días. RESULTADOS: Entre noviembre de 2018 y octubre de 2019, se reclutaron 140 pacientes de los que se analizaron 124. El tiempo de estancia total en el SUH de la vía POC fue de 112 minutos (DE 45) y en la vía STD 244 minutos (DE 102) (p 0,001). No hubo diferencias en el tratamiento administrado en urgencias, en el número de diagnósticos alternativos, ni en las complicaciones a 30 días. CONCLUSIONES: La utilización de una vía de alta resolución del manejo del CRU en un SUH es eficaz, segura y reduce el tiempo de estancia en urgencias.

Results of a Prospective Study to Evaluate the Impact of Point-of-Care Ultrasound in the Enhancement of Gastrointestinal Bleeding Risk Scores.

OBJECTIVES: Gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding is a common illness seen in the emergency department. The prognosis varies from self-limited to potentially life threatening. Currently available GI bleeding risk scores have only a modest predictive value, limiting their wide implementation. The aim of this study was to assess the association and capability of point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) used by emergency physicians to improve common GI bleeding scores for predicting complications and long-term outcomes of patients with GI bleeding, which to our knowledge have never been studied. METHODS: Between August 2015 and April 2017, 203 hemodynamically stable patients with acute GI bleeding admitted to the emergency department were prospectively investigated. Using ultrasound, we measured the inferior vena cava diameter, cardiac output with surrogate markers such as the velocity time integral before and after the passive leg-raising test, and the presence of systolic obliteration of the left ventricle. The Rockall and Glasgow-Blatchford scores were calculated for patients with upper GI bleeding and the Velayos score for lower GI bleeding. The patients had follow-up during hospitalization and 30 days later to assess for early and late adverse events (AEs). Then we integrated the ultrasound findings of hypovolemia into the GI bleeding scores, assessing the capability to detect AEs. RESULTS: In our cohort, patients with upper GI bleeding who showed left ventricle kissing walls had a worse evolution, with a greater presence of late AEs (odds ratio [OR], 3.8; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.32-10.96; P = .01). Patients with lower GI bleeding who showed a collapse of the inferior vena cava (>50%) after passive leg raising had a greater presence of early AEs (OR, 3.6; 95% CI, 1.46-9.00; P = .004). The predictive performance of the Rockall score (receiver operating characteristic analysis: area under the curve [AUC], 77.6%; 95% CI, 66.3%-88.8%) increased with POCUS (AUC, 80.3%; 95% CI, 69.5%-91.1%); that of the Glasgow-Blatchford score (AUC, 72.5%; 95% CI, 59.9%-85.2%) increased with POCUS (AUC, 73.2%; 95% CI, 61.1%-85.4%); and that of Velayos score (AUC, 55.7%; 95% CI, 42.5%-69.0%) also increased with POCUS (AUC, 72.2%; 95% CI, 61.1%-83.3%). CONCLUSIONS: The use of POCUS in GI bleeding is feasible and enhances common GI bleeding risk scores, showing better predictive performance in detecting AEs.

Oxygen Saturation on Admission Is a Predictive Biomarker for PD-L1 Expression on Circulating Monocytes and Impaired Immune Response in Patients With Sepsis.

Sepsis is a pathology in which patients suffer from a proinflammatory response and a dysregulated immune response, including T cell exhaustion. A number of therapeutic strategies to treat human sepsis, which are different from antimicrobial and fluid resuscitation treatments, have failed in clinical trials, and solid biomarkers for sepsis are still lacking. Herein, we classified 85 patients with sepsis into two groups according to their blood oxygen saturation (SaO2): group I (SaO2 ≤ 92%, n = 42) and group II (SaO2 > 92%, n = 43). Blood samples were taken before any treatment, and the immune response after ex vivo LPS challenge was analyzed, as well as basal expression of PD-L1 on monocytes and levels of sPD-L1 in sera. The patients were followed up for 1 month. Taking into account reinfection and exitus frequency, a significantly poorer evolution was observed in patients from group I. The analysis of HLA-DR expression on monocytes, T cell proliferation and cytokine profile after ex vivo LPS stimulation confirmed an impaired immune response in group I. In addition, these patients showed both, high levels of PD-L1 on monocytes and sPD-L1 in serum, resulting in a down-regulation of the adaptive response. A blocking assay using an anti-PD-1 antibody reverted the impaired response. Our data indicated that SaO2 levels on admission have emerged as a potential signature for immune status, including PD-L1 expression. An anti-PD-1 therapy could restore the T cell response in hypoxemic sepsis patients with SaO2 ≤ 92% and high PD-L1 levels.

Efficient diagnosis and treatment of acute paracetamol poisoning: cost-effectiveness analysis of approaches based on a hospital toxicovigilance program. / Eficiencia en el diagnóstico y tratamiento de la intoxicación aguda por paracetamol: análisis de costeefectividad a través de un programa de toxicovigilancia activa hospitalario.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate 5 diagnostic-therapeutic strategies for suspected acute paracetamol poisoning in terms of cost-effectiveness in a tertiary university hospital with an active, validated poisoning surveillance program (SAT-HULP). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Cost-effectiveness analysis of the 5 diagnostic-therapeutic alternatives considered when attending patients with suspected paracetamol poisoning. The alternatives were chosen by means of a decision tree. We studied patients detected by the SAT-HULP program between April 1, 2011, and January 31, 2015. The diagnostic-therapeutic alternatives were as follows: 1) systematic treatment of all patients with N-acetylcysteine (NAC), 2) NAC treatment according to the reported dose; 3) NAC treatment according to a Rümack-Matthew nomogram; 4) NAC treatment according to urine test results confirmed by a blood test, and 5) treatment according to elimination half-life calculation. Probability data were obtained from the SAT-HULP program and validation studies corresponding to the diagnostic tests. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed. RESULTS: The approaches that were most cost-effective were those guided by reported doses and nomograms. The incremental cost-effectiveness of treatment according to reported dose was €5985.37. The sensitivity analysis showed that the model was highly dependent on variations in the main variables; the probabilistic sensitivity analysis indicated an incremental cost-effectiveness of €25 111.06 (SD, €1 534 420.16; range, €42 136.03-€92 358.75) between the first approach (treat all cases) and last (calculate elimination half-life); half-life calculation was the more efficient. CONCLUSION: Treating according to nomogram was the most efficient diagnostic-therapeutic approach to treating paracetamol poisoning in our hospital. However, when the prevalence of paracetamol poisoning is higher and uncertainty is greater, it would be more efficient to treat based on calculating the half-life.

OBJETIVO: Evaluar la eficiencia de cinco estrategias diagnóstico-terapéuticas posibles ante la sospecha de intoxicación aguda (IA) por paracetamol (PCT) a través de un análisis coste-efectividad, según la perspectiva del financiador en un hospital universitario terciario dotado de un programa de toxicovigilancia activa validado (SAT-HULP). METODO: Estudio de análisis de coste-efectividad (ACE) de cinco alternativas diagnóstico-terapéuticas consideradas en el abordaje de los pacientes atendidos en el servicio de urgencias hospitalario (SUH) con intoxicación por PCT mediante un modelo de árbol de decisión. La población estudiada fueron los pacientes atendidos en un SUH detectados por el SAT-HULP, entre el 1/04/2011 y el 31/01/2015. Las alternativas diagnóstico-terapéuticas consideradas fueron: 1) administración sistemática de Nacetilcisteína; 2) administración del tratamiento según la dosis confirmada; 3) tratamiento según el nomograma de Rümack- Matthew; 4) tratamiento según test de orina confirmado con posterior test en sangre; y 5) tratamiento según el cálculo de la semivida. Los datos correspondientes a probabilidades fueron obtenidos del programa SAT-HULP y publicaciones sobre la validación de las pruebas diagnósticas. Se realizaron análisis de sensibilidad determinístico y probabilístico. RESULTADOS: Las opciones "Tratar según dosis comunicada" y "Tratar según el nomograma" son las que muestran mejor coste-efectividad. Al compararlas, la razón coste-efectividad incremental es de 5.985,37 € para la primera. El análisis de sensibilidad mostró una importante dependencia del modelo a la variación de las variables principales. En el análisis de sensibilidad probabilístico la estrategia "Tratar a todos los casos" respecto a "Cálculo de semivida" obtuvo una razón coste-efectividad incremental de unos 25.111,06 € (DE: 1.534.420,16; intervalo: ­42.136,03 a 92.358,75), resultando esta última la más eficiente. CONCLUSIONES: La estrategia "Tratar según el nomograma" es la alternativa más eficiente en el diagnóstico y tratamiento de la intoxicacióna aguda por Paracetamol en nuestro medio, no así para un escenario de mayor prevalencia e incertidumbre, donde la opción "Cálculo de semivida" se muestra como la más eficiente.

[Demand for emergency department care for vertebral fractures treated with transdermal buprenorphine vs. other analgesics]. / Demanda asistencial urgente en pacientes con fracturas vertebrales en función de la administración de buprenofrina transdérmica u otros tratamientos analgésicos.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the results of emergency department management of spinal pain from vertebral fractures (in terms of revisits, adverse effects at 90 days, or need for hospitalization because of poor pain control at 6 months) in patients treated with transdermal buprenorphine or another analgesic. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Retrospective observational study of cohorts in an emergency department database compiled prospectively over a period of 18 months. We included all patients over the age of 60 with a radiologic diagnosis of vertebral fracture or compression causing pain for more than 3 months. Records were stratified according to the World Health Organization (WHO) analgesic scale, which was used when the patients were treated. Variables related to effectiveness were revisits at 1 month, time between visits in days, and the need for hospitalization. RESULTS: A total of 180 patients were included; 39 were treated with drugs on the first step of the WHO's analgesic ladder, 74 with second-step drugs (mainly tramadol), and 67 with transdermal buprenorphine, a third-step drug. Half the patients treated with buprenorphine had revisited at 50 days or later (interquartile range [IQR, 41-60 days); half those treated with first-step analgesics had revisited by 19 days IQR, 10-37 days), and half those on second-step drugs had revisited by 28 days (IQR, 21-53 days) (P<.001). After adjustment for other variables, patients treated with first-step drugs revisited 4.19-fold more (95% CI, 2.57-6.80; P<.001) and those treated with second-step drugs revisited 1.91-fold more (95% CI, 1.22-2.99; P=.005) more than patients treated with transdermal buprenorphine. CONCLUSION: Transdermal buprenorphine used to manage spinal pain seems to significantly reduce the need for revisits in comparison with treatments with first- or second-step analgesics.

OBJETIVO: Comparar los resultados del manejo del dolor axial en pacientes con fracturas vertebrales, atendidos en un servicio de urgencias (SU) según hayan sido tratados con buprenorfina transdérmica u otro tratamiento analgésico, en términos de necesidad de nuevas consultas, aparición de efectos adversos a los 90 días o de necesidad de hospitalización por mal control analgésico a los 6 meses de la primera consulta. METODO: Estudio observacional de cohortes retrospectivo desde en una base de datos prospectiva de 18 meses, en un SU. Se incluyeron todos los pacientes mayores de 60 años, con diagnóstico radiológico de fractura/aplastamiento vertebral de más de 3 meses de evolución. Los registros fueron agrupados según el escalón analgésico de la OMS (Organización Mundial de la Salud) con el que fueron tratados los pacientes. Las variables de efectividad fueron: reconsulta al mes, tiempo de reconsulta en días y necesidad de hospitalización. RESULTADOS: Se incluyeron 180 pacientes, 39 tratados con fármacos del primer escalón analgésico de la OMS, 74 con fármacos del segundo escalón (fundamentalmente tramadol) y 67 con buprenorfina transdérmica (tercer escalón). El 50% de los pacientes tratados con buprenorfina reconsultaron a los 50 días o más (rango intercuartílico ­RIC­: 41- 60), mientras que en el grupo tratado con primer escalón a los 19 (RIC 10-37) y con el segundo escalón a los 28 (RIC 21-53) (p < 0,001). Al ajustar el tratamiento por el resto de las variables se determinó que los pacientes tratados con el primer escalón incrementaban la tasa de reconsulta en 4,19 veces (IC95%: 2,57-6,80; p < 0,001) y en los tratados con el segundo escalón 1,91 veces (IC95%: 1,22-2,99; p = 0,005) frente a los pacientes tratados con buprenorfina transdérmica. CONCLUSIONES: La administración de buprenorfina transdérmica en el control sintomático del dolor axial parece disminuir significativamente la necesidad de nuevas consultas repetidas comparada con terapias de primer y segundo escalón analgésico.

[Recommendations for the management of emergencies in patients with diabetes, acute metabolic complications of diabetes, and steroid-related hyperglycemia]. / Recomendaciones de manejo de la diabetes, de sus complicaciones metabólicas agudas y de la hiperglucemia relacionada con corticoides en los servicios de urgencias.

EN: Persons with diabetes make up a large percentage of patients attended in the emergency department. Most will be discharged, but patients who remain under observation in wards managed by the emergency department or who wait are waiting to be admitted to a conventional ward must receive appropriate, protocol-guided treatment for their diabetes. Situations of hyper- or hypoglycemia must be avoided because both worsen prognosis. Emergency physicians must correctly and efficiently prevent, diagnose, and manage acute metabolic complications of diabetes such as simple hyperglycemia, diabetic ketoacidosis, and hyperosmolar hyperglycemic state. They must also be ready to prescribe and properly administer intravenous insulin to critically ill patients. Hyperglycemia induced by treatment with steroids deserves special mention. If this complication develops, the hyperglycemia is intense, influenced by increased insulin resistance and gluconeogenesis in the liver. Thus, it usually appears after meals and is dependent on steroid dose, duration of treatment, and individual predisposition. The recommendations in this paper elaborated by consensus of the Spanish Society of Emergency Medicine (SEMES) experts, are the first to be written specifically for use in emergency departments in Spain. They give a detailed, in-depth overview of emergencies related to diabetes and diabetic complications.

ES: Un alto porcentaje de los pacientes atendidos en urgencias son diabéticos. La mayoría serán dados de alta. Sin embargo, los que se quedan en observación, ingresados en unidades dependientes de urgencias o los que quedan pendientes de ingreso en hospitalización convencional deben recibir un tratamiento correcto y protocolizado en cuanto a su diabetes, que evite tanto la hiper como la hipoglucemia, ya que ambas son situaciones que empeorarán el pronóstico del paciente. Por otro lado, los urgenciólogos deben prevenir, diagnosticar y manejar de una manera correcta y eficiente las complicaciones metabólicas agudas de la diabetes como son la hiperglucemia simple, la cetoacidosis diabética, la situación hiperosmolar y la hipoglucemia, así como las indicaciones y la forma de administración de insulina intravenosa en los pacientes críticos. Una mención aparte requiere también la hiperglucemia reactiva al tratamiento corticoideo. Esta hiperglucemia, en el caso de aparecer, es intensa y está influenciada por el aumento de la resistencia a la insulina y de la neoglucegénesis hepática que provocan los corticoides, por lo que será de predominio postprandial. Depende de la dosis y duración del tratamiento corticoideo además de una predisposición individual. Las recomendaciones que aquí se exponen, procedentes del consenso alcanzado por el grupo de expertos de la Sociedad Española de Medicina de Urgencias y Emergencias (SEMES), son las primeras redactadas en España dirigidas exclusivamente a los servicios de urgencias y que hacen una revisión pormenorizada y profunda sobre todas las situaciones que pueden encontrarse en cuanto a la diabetes y sus complicaciones.